| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:30:11 +0000 George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>>> I'd rather make it known that that sort of backhanded tactics to |
| 6 |
>>> get rid of someone you don't like won't work whoever uses them. |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>> You would certainly make that point. then let the other employee |
| 10 |
>> leave and let the employee in question know that it will not be |
| 11 |
>> tolerated in the future. Therefore saving the services of one of the |
| 12 |
>> best employees (and with it money) and also said employee |
| 13 |
>> knows /exactly/ where he stands for the future. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> And if said employee had already pulled several "I'm resigning" |
| 17 |
> publicity stunts in the past? And if said employee had seen other |
| 18 |
> people trying the same thing unsuccessfully? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
Then you deal with them at such a time as they appear, you do not let 2 |
| 21 |
employees go when everyone's integrity could have been kept with just |
| 22 |
the one leaving - therein lies the skill in 'people skills' |
| 23 |
> I think you're missing a clear view of the facts here... |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Incidentally, I'm unsure as to how your analogy applies here. You keep |
| 26 |
> mentioning 'best employee'. I'm not sure how that fits in. |
| 27 |
If i remember, I said "one of" and also (if i remember correctly) |
| 28 |
flameeyes happened to be head of two herds, a member of the council, had |
| 29 |
more cia commits than any developer and was one of THE most respected |
| 30 |
developers in the whole of Gentoo. |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives