Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Curtis Napier <curtis119@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: trustees@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 03:18:13
Message-Id: 45023138.8000208@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support by Chris Gianelloni
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: MD5
3
4 Chris Gianelloni wrote:
5 > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 23:50 -0400, Curtis Napier wrote:
6 >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
7 >> Hash: MD5
8 >>
9 >> I'm in support of having a list of devs who want to do paid support.
10 >> Anything that helps people eat is OK in my book. ;)
11 >>
12 >> On the other hand, I think we need to have the foundation run this past
13 >> our lawyer(s) and make sure we have our i's dotted and out t's crossed.
14 >> I would hate for something good like this to cause us problems down the
15 >> road.
16 >
17 > Umm... The Foundation has zero to do with a contract between two third
18 > parties. Let me give you an example. I am currently doing paid "Gentoo
19 > work" for a company, who will remain nameless. I filled out paperwork
20 > with the company. My being a member of the Gentoo Foundation, a
21 > Trustee, or anything else, has exactly zero bearing on my being
22 > contracted, as an individual, to a company.
23 >
24 >> I know christel is consulting with an accountant about adpot-a-dev,
25 >> maybe she can throw this in as well?
26 >
27 > Do we have to do some special law-abiding dance to have sponsors listed
28 > on the site? What about advertisers?
29 >
30 > What Christel is researching is the tax law related to individuals
31 > receiving gifts. It has no bearing on the Foundation itself.
32 >
33 > Let's look at this another way. We have advertisers that sell Gentoo
34 > servers and Gentoo-based services. How exactly is this any different?
35 > Is it because they're developers? How does that matter? In the end,
36 > the contract is entirely between two third-party entities, the
37 > developer, and whomever contracts him. It isn't like the Foundation is
38 > offering services. It isn't. The individual developers are offering
39 > services. The Foundation is not any of our employer. We are not bound
40 > by any legal contract to the Foundation, and it has no ties to us.
41 >
42
43 Giving ad space to our sponsors is legal for us to do as a Not For
44 Profit because they are donating goods and/or services to us.
45 Technically we are not giving them "ads", we are acknowledging the
46 donated goods and/or services. Just like PBS does at the beginning of
47 it's shows, they aren't ads but acknowledgments of donations.
48
49 Basically I just want to make sure that we are not breaking any of the
50 rules of being a Not For Profit foundation. The IRS doesn't accept "We
51 didn't know any better" as an excuse when they come knocking on our door
52 to re-evaluate our Not For Profit status because we are giving free
53 advertising to people who *ARE* being paid in a For Profit manner.
54
55 And if the IRS changes our status we *may* be liable for back taxes.
56
57 I know I'm the only one who ever says anything about the legality of
58 what we do and always brings the Foundation into it but let's face
59 facts: The Gentoo web properties are owned and operated by the Gentoo
60 Foundation which means that those web properties MUST follow the law
61 concerning Not For Profit.
62
63 If no one else is concerned about it then I'll drop it but when the day
64 comes and the IRS is a knockin'.... don't look at me. Besides, what can
65 it hurt to have one of the Foundation Trustees ask one of our lawyers
66 about it?
67
68 - --Curtis
69 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
70 Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
71 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
72
73 iQEVAwUBRQIxOEb8Q0uRCeTQAQFDMggAzP8sLxQ1btrjo6OioDxEgU65nvCSNfT0
74 Qn8gDxlcPA5HtRZA5c3Rw2uM2sCC55C2tW3SVoa5EJFH9Gs/cnzNkAdNeW8HaQTD
75 ErG9WvZKsI/fvax1JHIgBTq03p81WxIY9GFc6olCdr0BgFptiZIx2kPaxZ+6q/wY
76 0Zv1nzzvet3lmM2ZYet35vds0WrhyHrqAvUcvlcgcz6gmlsmOXlS/WXazRi8636T
77 5yytNzfV7pdsf3t2BF+n3Cg93kiF2x4u2OV/rPUFWHpkzpjoTB5XNEgogelrDMQn
78 wBhxbN4LE96mc/Km+vD7Mt8cBU/8UFmn1wMKyVGsLS6xReADkD4+Ew==
79 =7+lW
80 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
81 --
82 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Paid support Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>