Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: new herd: theology
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:22:30
Message-Id: pan.2007.04.28.13.16.26@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: new herd: theology by "Thomas Rösner"
1 Thomas Rösner <Thomas.Roesner@××××××××××××××.de> posted
2 4633408F.5030507@××××××××××××××.de, excerpted below, on Sat, 28 Apr 2007
3 14:39:43 +0200:
4
5 > I still fail to see why this is such a big thing if one package which is
6 > mainly used in relation to a religion is in a herd called theology. It's
7 > not as if the world will come to a shattering halt and chaos will reign.
8 > If for some reason the gnome herd adopted fluxbox or the KDE people
9 > would take care of HAL, would you object because their herd names don't
10 > fit? Even if the alternative was the packet remaining herdless, because
11 > no other herd was interested?
12 >
13 > It's not as if this is a giant library, where a book will be lost
14 > forever if it's in the wrong category, or like putting ID on the science
15 > curriculum. Herds loosely lump related packages together, don't they? I
16 > thought they were just infrastructure, not real categories.
17
18 Indeed. That's why while I don't personally agree with the idea of
19 genealogy in theology, I think it goes in sci-*, I also don't believe
20 it's a big deal in terms of herd placement. Herd placement is primarily
21 of "internal Gentoo interest", that is, to Gentoo devs/ATs/etc, not even
22 most users except for filing bugs and if it's automated there... .
23
24 If it was tree category placement and therefore could conceivably affect
25 Gentoo user discoverability or otherwise had any significant external
26 meaning at all, there might be /some/ reason to argue about it, but if
27 it's only of interest internally for administrative use or the like,
28 altho as I said it might raise a few eyebrows when folks happen across
29 it.
30
31 It's not as if it makes a difference, either to devs involved with it who
32 will be involved anyway, or to those not interested in which case most
33 won't touch it anyway, or even to bug wranglers or the like since that
34 will be partially automated and where it isn't, they'll soon have job-
35 specific internal knowledge like this down along with all the rest of
36 it. Since it's not going to make a difference, certainly one of any
37 significance, what's the big deal? "Much ado about nothing"?
38 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Much_Ado_About_Nothing )
39
40 --
41 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
42 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
43 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
44
45 --
46 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: new herd: theology Dominique Michel <dominique.michel@×××××××××.ch>