1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
I would hate to drag this discussion on endlessly, so I promise this |
4 |
will be my only post :). |
5 |
|
6 |
Dominique Michel wrote: |
7 |
> Le Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:07:26 -0700, |
8 |
> Josh Saddler <nightmorph@g.o> a écrit : |
9 |
> |
10 |
> |
11 |
>> Steve Dibb wrote: |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>>> Dominique Michel wrote: |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>>> I fully agree, theology is the worst possible name if the herd will |
16 |
>>>> include |
17 |
>>>> both religious and scientific softwares. |
18 |
>>>> |
19 |
>>> No worries, app-misc/gramps was dropped from the theology herd, and is |
20 |
>>> herdless once again. |
21 |
>>> |
22 |
>> So what's the big problem |
23 |
>> of sticking it into a herd somewhere, a herd that seems to be maintained |
24 |
>> by just one person (beandog in this case)? |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> |
27 |
> The fact at the herd is maintained by one or more peoples have nothing to do |
28 |
> with this. It is about the meaning of the words and consistency. If I put |
29 |
> gramps into theology, I can put gnome into kde, mplayer into media-sound and |
30 |
> grabcartoons into theology. |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
I still fail to see why this is such a big thing if one package which is |
34 |
mainly used in relation to a religion is in a herd called theology. It's |
35 |
not as if the world will come to a shattering halt and chaos will reign. |
36 |
If for some reason the gnome herd adopted fluxbox or the KDE people |
37 |
would take care of HAL, would you object because their herd names don't |
38 |
fit? Even if the alternative was the packet remaining herdless, because |
39 |
no other herd was interested? |
40 |
|
41 |
It's not as if this is a giant library, where a book will be lost |
42 |
forever if it's in the wrong category, or like putting ID on the science |
43 |
curriculum. Herds loosely lump related packages together, don't they? I |
44 |
thought they were just infrastructure, not real categories. |
45 |
|
46 |
Regards, |
47 |
Thomas |
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |