| 1 |
On 08/13/2017 12:06 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> There is a down side you didn't talk about -- more work for the arch |
| 4 |
> teams and for us in terms of stabilizations. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> When we revbump, a new revision automatically gets ~ keywords on all arches |
| 7 |
> unless we make an exception. If a revision changes iuse but could still |
| 8 |
> be built with the stable tree, I would want to be able to commit this |
| 9 |
> type of revision directly to stable. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I don't think you should be adding features and code to stable ebuilds |
| 13 |
in the first place, but if you're going to do it, then I wouldn't let a |
| 14 |
little -r1 on the end of the filename stop you =P |
Archives