1 |
[Oh no! How did I let myself get sucked into a gentoo-dev thread? ;-)] |
2 |
|
3 |
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 13:31 -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
[...] |
6 |
> I'll just throw out a couple of my own comments: |
7 |
> |
8 |
[ I'm skipping the first one because it doesn't interest me] |
9 |
|
10 |
[Comment about Gentoo's non-participation in LSB] |
11 |
|
12 |
While I somewhat agree, I think Gentoo's main selling point (at least |
13 |
for me) is that is the way it stands out from your typical Linux distro. |
14 |
It's source-based package system was once what distinguished it from the |
15 |
rest. In summary, I don't think Gentoo should totally adapt to what |
16 |
"the rest" are going any more than I think Slackware or GoboLinux |
17 |
should. What I do see is that perhaps there are ideas that Gentoo has |
18 |
that maybe other distros could benefit from, and vice versa. But |
19 |
sometimes we have to agree to disagree with "mainstream". |
20 |
|
21 |
As for "enterprise"... that's fine. Gentoo has traditionally been the |
22 |
kind of distro that throws you just enough rope to hang oneself, so I |
23 |
never really considered it an "enterprise" Linux, but if that is the |
24 |
direction that it wants to head in then it benefit it to make it more |
25 |
known to the general public. |
26 |
|
27 |
[Stuff about distrowatch, other distros and "market" share...] |
28 |
|
29 |
> Gentoo "share of mind" is dropping and dropping rapidly, although I don't think |
30 |
> it's because of misbehavior in the community. I think it's because: |
31 |
> |
32 |
> a. Daniel Robbins left and went to Microsoft, leaving no "Mr. Gentoo", and |
33 |
|
34 |
I would generalize this more. I would say that "Mr. Gentoo" |
35 |
isn't/wasn't Daniel Robbins but Larry, and in recent times Larry has not |
36 |
enlightened us with his vision of Gentoo and where it's going. We have |
37 |
http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/about.xml but where do we go from there? |
38 |
Maybe we need to have a sit down with Larry so we can know what Gentoo |
39 |
really is. |
40 |
|
41 |
> b. No effort to seek corporate support, at least none that I'm aware of. |
42 |
|
43 |
I would also like to generalize this more. Instead of "corporate |
44 |
support" I would say funding, whether it's corporate or what. I think |
45 |
it's important to convince people that they should give us money, and we |
46 |
should have the wisdom and capability of receiving said money and doing |
47 |
something productive with it. |
48 |
|
49 |
> In short, I'm not sure there is any future for *any* "pure community |
50 |
> distro". Somehow Gentoo needs to at least find a marketable defendable |
51 |
> niche and some kind of corporate sponsorship. Maybe embedded will turn |
52 |
> out to be that niche -- I'd love to have even 1/4 of Portage on |
53 |
> something like a Zaurus or "iPhone". |
54 |
|
55 |
It's NFP, but even NFP has to have some sort of structure and unified |
56 |
vision. Even my neighborhood coop has decent solidarity and a marketing |
57 |
strategy. |
58 |
|
59 |
-- |
60 |
Albert W. Hopkins |
61 |
|
62 |
-- |
63 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |