Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 18:56:25
Message-Id: 20130701205615.18fdcea2@TOMWIJ-GENTOO
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration. by Markos Chandras
1 On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 19:38:48 +0100
2 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > I certainly don't feel safe anymore running non-upstream code in
5 > production boxes.
6
7 You don't run it unless you explicitly tick on that you want
8 experimental functionality _as well as_ the optional features in
9 question; as I said earlier on chat, I don't understand your point here.
10
11 If you don't enable them, genpatches is just like it is before; I'm
12 not sure why the recommendations should change here, especially with
13 vanilla-sources taking a further step away from Gentoo Security and QA.
14
15 --
16 With kind regards,
17
18 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
19 Gentoo Developer
20
21 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
22 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
23 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies