Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Well, that was, um, interesting
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 22:36:44
Message-Id: 7c612fc60703051432w112b183dq5b805d4129045411@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Well, that was, um, interesting by Grant Goodyear
1 On 3/5/07, Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> wrote:
2 > That said, I'm not necessarily opposed to mandating civility, a la
3 > Ubuntu. I do see a minor problem with that approach, though: right now
4 > it is not clear that Gentoo has a group of devs who are sufficiently
5 > trusted and willing to actually punish incivility. Thoughts?
6
7 We have shown our trust and delegated some of our decisional power to
8 a group of devs last summer, by electing them to the council. To me
9 that means they have enough authority to take this kind of action. Now
10 if we really want to respond to incivility in any way (I hate to call
11 that punishment, I'd rather see it as giving an opportunity to cool
12 down for some time), we can't afford to wait for the monthly council
13 meeting. As, and recent history proves it, the chain reaction is hard
14 to stop past a certain temperature.
15
16 Also, the question is: are they willing to do it?
17
18 Denis.
19 --
20 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Well, that was, um, interesting "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>