| 1 |
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Except that there is no machines using it. In all contexts, using full URL for machine readability is better as it works with all software out of the box. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Until the domain name of the bugzilla server changes/etc. Even if we |
| 7 |
migrated all the old bugs the URLs would break. That might be an |
| 8 |
argument for not having a full URL. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
There would also be less variation. Bug: 123456 is pretty unambiguous |
| 11 |
as a reference. When you start having http vs https and maybe a few |
| 12 |
different ways of creating a URL to a bug it could get messier. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That said, I really don't have a strong opinion on this. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Rich |
Archives