| 1 |
On Sunday 08 November 2009 13:10:34 Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote: |
| 3 |
> > В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет: |
| 4 |
> > > And because I'm a lazy |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just |
| 7 |
> > > fix it instead |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Do you mean that whatever you commit to the tree is not your |
| 10 |
> > responsibility? Sorry but it's your job. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I make things work. Cosmetics are quite low on my list of priorities. |
| 13 |
> Feel free to fix such things. |
| 14 |
> All "my" packages are free for all to bump, fix and extend, as long as |
| 15 |
> whoever touched it is willing to fix any issues that happen from it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
using this definition of "correct" (the package installs w/out failure and it |
| 18 |
seems to work), there is a lot of crap that could be in the tree. that doesnt |
| 19 |
mean the ebuild should be in the tree. this kind of work and opinion belongs |
| 20 |
in sunrise, not the main tree. we dont have a QA team to fix installed |
| 21 |
packages; they're here to maintain the *quality* of the tree. |
| 22 |
-mike |
Archives