| 1 |
On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 17:57 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> eds - please, fix the ebuilds properly instead of throwing the thing on |
| 4 |
> everyone. This has already caused numerous invalid bugs with people |
| 5 |
> wondering why the heck portage wants to emerge gnome with USE="-gtk -gnome" |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
How do you suggest the ebuilds be fixed properly? per ebuild use |
| 9 |
defaults that don't exist? This is the 2nd time somebody has mentioned |
| 10 |
fixing the ebuilds, without really backing it up with anything. Unless |
| 11 |
y'all have something in mind, please stop using phrases like "fix your |
| 12 |
ebuilds" to make it look like you have a point. I'm sorry for the time |
| 13 |
you have spent with invalid bugs(and you are doing a good job since I've |
| 14 |
never seen one..kudos), I know that is a drag and doesn't really help |
| 15 |
anybody in the long run, but this argument is no different then the |
| 16 |
argument for any other default flag. For the record, the eds flag was |
| 17 |
added as a default flag because every 3rd gnome user would file bugs or |
| 18 |
complain via forums because they installed gnome, found no |
| 19 |
evolution-data-server integration, and then be bummed when they had to |
| 20 |
recompile packages again. This whole thread seems to have come from a |
| 21 |
misunderstanding of how use.defaults work and 20 min of boredom. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives