1 |
26.12.2005, 16:35:33, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 00:09:57 -0500 Doug Goldstein <cardoe@g.o> |
4 |
> wrote: |
5 |
> | the USE defaults are a bit INSANE... We need to get rid of some of |
6 |
> | this crap... |
7 |
|
8 |
> No, you just don't understand how they work. It's not an issue of |
9 |
> "is foo important". It's an issue of "for packages with optional foo |
10 |
> support, does it make most sense for foo to be enabled by default?". |
11 |
|
12 |
OK, then: |
13 |
|
14 |
alsa - this does not make most sense definitely, this horrible thing needs |
15 |
to die. |
16 |
|
17 |
emboss - "Adds support for the European Molecular Biology Open Software |
18 |
Suite." WTF? Why are we abusing make.defaults for such stuff? |
19 |
|
20 |
eds - please, fix the ebuilds properly instead of throwing the thing on |
21 |
everyone. This has already caused numerous invalid bugs with people |
22 |
wondering why the heck portage wants to emerge gnome with USE="-gtk -gnome" |
23 |
|
24 |
motif - no need to repeat Cardoe's description... and this has caused tons |
25 |
of "cups depends on X" bugs. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Best regards, |
30 |
|
31 |
Jakub Moc |
32 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
33 |
GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
34 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
35 |
|
36 |
... still no signature ;) |