Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Weber <xmw@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Soliciting input for a non-maintainer update (NMU) GLEP
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:31:26
Message-Id: 51C4B80C.1020605@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Soliciting input for a non-maintainer update (NMU) GLEP by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On 06/21/2013 08:50 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
2 [NMU]
3
4 Abstract: Be verbose about your preferences.
5
6 == TL;DR ==
7
8 I'm missing this kind of information since the beginning.
9 After 2 (?) years, i've learned some policies, like herd:desktop-* is
10 free for all, don't touch herd:base-system and so on. But I did not keep
11 records of every fella granting me full access.
12
13
14 As a maintainer and slacker (as flameeyes pointed out), I singularily
15 maintain my share of packages [1] with a rich variety of affection.
16
17 Less/singular affection (like the miredo/sbin/ip mishap, a package i
18 proxied for a friend), I work on rand maintainer-needed@g.o packages,
19 don't take maint and try to watch bugzie for follow ups.
20 -> just go ahead and do what you think is right
21
22 Total, regular affection, (cwm, ncdc, ncdu, mupdf (+derivates), llpp,
23 netsurf, jumanji) and basically my inital commits.
24 -> give me at least two days to review changes.
25
26 Either way, go ahead, BUT I __really__ like being informed about an NMU
27 carried out, nothing sucks more than doing the update and see
28 repoman+cvs reject the update (yeah, work on an fresh checkout blah blah).
29
30 As an impatient person with an urge to fix things, I often commit on
31 random stuff, after asking or timeout. I'd like to propose three
32 positions to post information about NMU-policy, preferred way of
33 communication, affection to bulk-mail|reports|...|euscan update|KEQWORDREQ
34
35 - Every dev as person, like an devaway.
36 - Every herd, somwhere in herds.xml
37 - Every Package-category (for project-categories like vim/kde/gnome/)
38 (it'd be usefull to fetch and provide this info as equery meta output).
39
40 (Yes, I've broken and will break things, my sincerest apologies, I
41 really try hard. Thanks for ssuominen being a encouraging example.)
42
43 At some point I'm really scared about reactions in the past and avoid
44 certain areas, persons and really basic|widespread stuff like zsh (bug
45 19924, [2]).
46
47 my 2 cents.
48
49 [1] http://euscan.iksaif.net/maintainers/48/
50 [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19924
51
52 --
53 Michael Weber
54 Gentoo Developer
55 web: https://xmw.de/
56 mailto: Michael Weber <xmw@g.o>

Replies