Archives
Archives
| From: | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Cc: | overlays@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI | ||
| Date: | Sun, 05 Jun 2016 16:41:06 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAATnKFAFgXq4p5dMZfdLV5bpZcrzkFAy7ieXjG8xJVH90jerdg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI by rindeal |
||
| 1 | On 6 June 2016 at 04:31, rindeal <dev.rindeal@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > Isn't no commit approach better than having broken commit + revert |
| 3 | > commit? |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Huh? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Its doing "replicate to github on pass using a merge commit". |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Kent |
| 12 | |
| 13 | KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI | rindeal <dev.rindeal@×××××.com> |