Archives
Archives
| From: | rindeal <dev.rindeal@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | overlays@g.o, kentfredric@×××××.com | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI | ||
| Date: | Sun, 05 Jun 2016 16:50:21 | ||
| Message-Id: | CANgLvuCO=AY9xz4H-A4nBV6kNS7FdfNCCYZVrjQTgBtRTNV+Nw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI by Kent Fredric |
||
| 1 | On 5 June 2016 at 18:40, Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > On 6 June 2016 at 04:31, rindeal <dev.rindeal@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | >> Isn't no commit approach better than having broken commit + revert |
| 4 | >> commit? |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > Huh? |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > Its doing "replicate to github on pass using a merge commit". |
| 10 | |
| 11 | I'd like to see the master branch free of commits which do not pass |
| 12 | CI, instead of having broken commits and holding master back until |
| 13 | revert commits are introduced. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI | "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |