| 1 |
Chris White wrote: |
| 2 |
> We have an alternative stated [1]. I think we need to focus more on the |
| 3 |
> problems of using the alternative, then dealing with what some consider to be |
| 4 |
> a rather sketchy legal dispute. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> [1] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debburn |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
WTH is debburn??? Geeez, make the folk respect GPL like everyone else, I |
| 9 |
don't want any debburn. Besides, we don't distribute any binaries (if we |
| 10 |
do on release media, we'll have to stop until JS regains a bit of mental |
| 11 |
sanity). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Best regards, |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Jakub Moc |
| 18 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 19 |
GPG signature: |
| 20 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 21 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives