| 1 |
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 02:31:30PM +0200, Torsten Veller wrote: |
| 2 |
> Please don't assign bugs of packages in the tree to maintainer-needed. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Proposal: Bugs for packages in the tree where bugwranglers are not able to find |
| 5 |
> a maintainer go to qa@g.o. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
You mean new ebuilds would go to maintainer-needed@g.o and existing but |
| 8 |
unmaintained ebuilds to qa@g.o? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Personally I'm most interested in an alias for bugs in packages that |
| 11 |
are already in the tree, but don't have an active maintainer. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Right now it's hard if not impossible to query for these bugs. |
| 14 |
New ebuild requests are quite easily listed by querying for 'enhancement', |
| 15 |
something with ebuild in the subject, assigned to bug-wranglers or any |
| 16 |
combination of the above. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> Bump requests might be annoying, but i think it's still the best thing to do. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Huh? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
Maurice. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Maurice van der Pot |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Gentoo Linux Developer griffon26@g.o http://www.gentoo.org |
| 29 |
Creator of BiteMe! griffon26@××××××××.com http://www.kfk4ever.com |
Archives