Archives
Archives
| From: | Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Cc: | wg-stable@g.o, arch-leads@g.o, alpha@g.o, amd64@g.o, amd64-fbsd@g.o, arm@g.o, arm64@g.o, hppa@g.o, ia64@g.o, m68k@g.o, mips@g.o, ppc@g.o, ppc64@g.o, s390@g.o, sh@g.o, sparc@g.o, x86@g.o, x86-fbsd@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 27 Jul 2017 23:13:40 | ||
| Message-Id: | CA+CSuA+7D+mqmmgp0=rczZ9P9BJef41YbqUHAjR95kGM+oQJDg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? by Sergei Trofimovich |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o> |
| 2 | wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > TL;DR;TL;DR: |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | [...] |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Here's a data point you may, or may not, find relevant. in 16 years of |
| 9 | using Gentoo exclusively, the only one time I used stable on one machine |
| 10 | for about 2 years it ended up being much more of a pain than unstable. |
| 11 | Actually, I can't say I have anything to complain about unstable. On my |
| 12 | critical machines I snapshot the system subvolume before I update. I can't |
| 13 | remember the last time I had to roll back. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | I'm sure most will disagree with me but since you're indirectly asking for |
| 16 | my opinion here it is: I think people working on stable are wasting their |
| 17 | time. But who am I to stop them... |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? | Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> |