Archives
Archives
| From: | Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds | ||
| Date: | Mon, 17 Oct 2016 15:01:54 | ||
| Message-Id: | cab3055b-a862-d26b-3a28-e956e71bb935@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds by Michael Mol |
||
| 1 | On 17/10/16 10:54 AM, Michael Mol wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > There's also firefox-bin, which gets built upstream with profile-guided |
| 4 | > optimizations enabled. PGO is unsupported outside of upstream's build process, |
| 5 | > last I checked...but that was a few years ago. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Mozilla project has a dev that's supporting PGO builds in the source |
| 9 | package now. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | That said, the primary reason why the mozilla *-bin packages exist in |
| 12 | Gentoo is because that's all that upstream officially supports. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Package file name requirement for binary ebuilds | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> |