Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] usr merge
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 11:31:18
Message-Id: 57079677.9010900@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] usr merge by Rich Freeman
1 On 4/8/16 6:14 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:42 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
3 >>
4 >> There was a bypo here. "the ebuild" should be upstream. The default
5 >> installation location of all coreutils binaries is /usr/bin, then we
6 >> move everything around in the ebuild.
7 >> We are deviating from upstream in this example.
8 >>
9 >
10 > Keep in mind that following upstream and the /usr merge are somewhat
11 > orthogonal. You can just install those binaries in /usr without
12 > merging everything over.
13 >
14 > The only issue is that without the merge anybody embedding a path to
15 > these binaries would have to fix their packages. Presumably to aid
16 > the transition a symlink (at the file level) would be needed for some
17 > period of time.
18 >
19
20
21 @anyone, can you list the reasons we're doing this (I'm sure there's
22 more than one). If systemd if one of them, then I'm confused because
23 debian has switched to systemd and yet has not merged usr.
24
25 --
26 Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
27 Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
28 E-Mail : blueness@g.o
29 GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
30 GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] usr merge James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] usr merge Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o>