1 |
Kevin F. Quinn wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>On 5/9/2005 1:29:57, Ciaran McCreesh (ciaranm@g.o) wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>>On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 1:12:54 +0200 "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o> |
7 |
>>wrote: |
8 |
>>| 3) All packages need to be assigned an x86 arch team member |
9 |
>>| responsible. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>>Why? |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> |
14 |
> |
15 |
>Because if only the x86 arch team can mark stuff stable, anything |
16 |
>without representation on the x86 arch team will stay unstable forever. |
17 |
>Maybe rather than one specific arch team member, several would |
18 |
>undertake to manage otherwise unassigned packages. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
Well, but, assigning each ebuild an x86 arch member is not the same than |
22 |
to have the package mantainer taking care of that? , i think the idea |
23 |
with the arch team |
24 |
is to centralize QA. |
25 |
|
26 |
> |
27 |
> |
28 |
>>| 6) I notice the amd64 team requre their arch testers to |
29 |
>>| take the ebuild quiz; I think this is a bit harsh, as |
30 |
>>| arch testers are regular users without commit access to |
31 |
>>| CVS etc. A simpler quiz targetted at ensuring the arch |
32 |
>>| testers know what is expected of them would lower the |
33 |
>>| bar and should encourage more users to join in. Using |
34 |
>>| the ebuild quiz means you get people who quickly become |
35 |
>>| devs in their own right... |
36 |
>> |
37 |
>>The ebuild quiz isn't particularly difficult... If the proposed "write |
38 |
>>an ebuild for equizapp" question goes through then maybe they could be |
39 |
>>exempt from that until they need cvs access, but the main ebuild quiz |
40 |
>>just tests basic understanding. |
41 |
>> |
42 |
>> |
43 |
> |
44 |
>I guess it comes down to what you want a tester to do. In my mind, the |
45 |
>task of a tester is to emerge the package normally, record the use flag |
46 |
>configuration, and exercise the application as much as possible. Possibly |
47 |
>repeating with other use flag configurations. If you want testers to do |
48 |
>ebuild QA, then the ebuild quiz becomes relevant, but I don't think it's |
49 |
>a good idea.. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> |
52 |
> |
53 |
> |
54 |
We could write a basic 'arch team' quiz?. It might be a slightly |
55 |
modified version |
56 |
of the ebuild quiz.If the arch team menber wanna be a Gentoo dev with |
57 |
commit access he could |
58 |
just take the ebuild quiz later. |
59 |
|
60 |
And if for example someone takes the ebuild quiz , he could be both a |
61 |
dev and a arch team |
62 |
member of course, in other words, the arch team quiz would be a sub-set of |
63 |
the ebuild quiz targeted for arch teams. |
64 |
-- |
65 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |