1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Luis F. Araujo wrote: |
5 |
| Kevin F. Quinn wrote: |
6 |
| |
7 |
|> On 5/9/2005 1:29:57, Ciaran McCreesh (ciaranm@g.o) wrote: |
8 |
|> |
9 |
|> |
10 |
|>> On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 1:12:54 +0200 "Kevin F. Quinn" <kevquinn@g.o> |
11 |
|>> wrote: |
12 |
|>> | 3) All packages need to be assigned an x86 arch team member |
13 |
|>> | responsible. |
14 |
|>> |
15 |
|>> Why? |
16 |
|>> |
17 |
|> |
18 |
|> |
19 |
|> Because if only the x86 arch team can mark stuff stable, anything |
20 |
|> without representation on the x86 arch team will stay unstable forever. |
21 |
|> Maybe rather than one specific arch team member, several would |
22 |
|> undertake to manage otherwise unassigned packages. |
23 |
|> |
24 |
|> |
25 |
| Well, but, assigning each ebuild an x86 arch member is not the same than |
26 |
| to have the package mantainer taking care of that? , i think the idea |
27 |
| with the arch team |
28 |
| is to centralize QA. |
29 |
| |
30 |
|> |
31 |
|> |
32 |
|>> | 6) I notice the amd64 team requre their arch testers to |
33 |
|>> | take the ebuild quiz; I think this is a bit harsh, as |
34 |
|>> | arch testers are regular users without commit access to |
35 |
|>> | CVS etc. A simpler quiz targetted at ensuring the arch |
36 |
|>> | testers know what is expected of them would lower the |
37 |
|>> | bar and should encourage more users to join in. Using |
38 |
|>> | the ebuild quiz means you get people who quickly become |
39 |
|>> | devs in their own right... |
40 |
|>> |
41 |
|>> The ebuild quiz isn't particularly difficult... If the proposed "write |
42 |
|>> an ebuild for equizapp" question goes through then maybe they could be |
43 |
|>> exempt from that until they need cvs access, but the main ebuild quiz |
44 |
|>> just tests basic understanding. |
45 |
|>> |
46 |
|> |
47 |
|> |
48 |
|> I guess it comes down to what you want a tester to do. In my mind, the |
49 |
|> task of a tester is to emerge the package normally, record the use flag |
50 |
|> configuration, and exercise the application as much as possible. |
51 |
|> Possibly |
52 |
|> repeating with other use flag configurations. If you want testers to do |
53 |
|> ebuild QA, then the ebuild quiz becomes relevant, but I don't think it's |
54 |
|> a good idea.. |
55 |
|> |
56 |
|> |
57 |
|> |
58 |
|> |
59 |
| We could write a basic 'arch team' quiz?. It might be a slightly |
60 |
| modified version |
61 |
| of the ebuild quiz.If the arch team menber wanna be a Gentoo dev with |
62 |
| commit access he could |
63 |
| just take the ebuild quiz later. |
64 |
| |
65 |
| And if for example someone takes the ebuild quiz , he could be both a |
66 |
| dev and a arch team |
67 |
| member of course, in other words, the arch team quiz would be a sub-set of |
68 |
| the ebuild quiz targeted for arch teams. |
69 |
|
70 |
another example of confusion of what AT means. AT == archtester, not |
71 |
arch team. |
72 |
|
73 |
- -- |
74 |
======================================================= |
75 |
Mike Doty kingtaco@g.o |
76 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead PGP Key: 0xA797C7A7 |
77 |
Gentoo Developer Relations |
78 |
~ ===GPG Fingerprint=== |
79 |
~ 0094 7F06 913E 78D6 F1BB 06BA D0AD D125 A797 C7A7 |
80 |
======================================================= |
81 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
82 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
83 |
|
84 |
iD8DBQFDHHs40K3RJaeXx6cRAghfAJ9Tri5VEUJEB42mw8kgWkDPK4diJwCffaZl |
85 |
iLAux+XlgcZpo+9S3jB9/bM= |
86 |
=E20M |
87 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
88 |
-- |
89 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |