| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Wednesday 21 July 2004 22:51, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 5 |
> What makes you think you would have to fill it out manually? Why |
| 6 |
> couldn't using: echangelog "I changed this to fix bug #69" simply do the |
| 7 |
> XML for you? Is there a reason why you think it couldn't? It might |
| 8 |
> change slightly, but I don't see that things would go to hand-writing |
| 9 |
> xml any time soon. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I never assumed to write xml by hand - Stuarts email sound a bit like it - but |
| 12 |
even "field1"<enter>, "field2"<enter>, ... would be annoying. If echangelog |
| 13 |
would be smart and parse the input, that would be ok. Maybe I got it wrong, |
| 14 |
but I was under the impression that there would be at least one new field be |
| 15 |
introduced, indicating the importance of a bug fix; And a increasing number |
| 16 |
of fields wouldn't make parsing input simpler. If using xml doesn't |
| 17 |
complicate writing the ChangeLog I'm all for it. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Carsten |
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iD8DBQFA/5hXVwbzmvGLSW8RAvx/AKCbtRwzCnQIM6s61rcpHawNx/gpSQCdHlpP |
| 25 |
Fv00d3oZiBaQOulj3zEk5ts= |
| 26 |
=4D8R |
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives