1 |
On Sat, 23 May 2015 07:16:10 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 2:18 AM, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
> > On 11 May 2015 15:59:40 CEST, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> >> |
5 |
> >>I'd REALLY like to see a FOSS alternative to Gmail (a good one, that |
6 |
> >>is), and ditto for Google docs (or whatever the latest branding for |
7 |
> >>that is). There is nothing magical about cloud-based services any more |
8 |
> >>than there is anything magical about letting somebody else host your |
9 |
> >>website. The key is to ensure that the technologies are open so that |
10 |
> >>you aren't bound to a single provider. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Rich, |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > If you are thinking of a FOSS email provider. Maybe investigate Fastmail? |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > They use postfix and cyrus. And they also handle a lot of the development of the latter. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> |
19 |
> My mail all goes through my own postfix server and POP/IMAP server |
20 |
> before it gets to Gmail, and I already have an alternative solution |
21 |
> for outbound SMTP for this server. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I was talking about a decent FOSS browser-based MUA. The only ones |
24 |
> I'm aware of are Roundcube and Squirrelmail, and neither supports |
25 |
> keyboard shortcuts or tag-based mail as far as I'm aware. Actually, |
26 |
> I'm not aware of any FOSS IMAP implementation that supports tagging - |
27 |
> that is an email can be in more than one "folder" at the same time. |
28 |
> But, I haven't looked too closely into that since without an MUA it |
29 |
> isn't terribly useful. |
30 |
|
31 |
Sylpheed supports filters which allow you to have e-mails in |
32 |
multiple directories based on arbitrary user-defined filtering. |
33 |
It supports IMAP also, though I never use it as I prefer POP3 and |
34 |
SMTP. |
35 |
|
36 |
Best regards, |
37 |
Andrew Savchenko |