| 1 |
Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
>> except that it moves it deeper down into the "how |
| 4 |
>> do I determine whether this news item is relevant?" area. And the only |
| 5 |
>> way to get around that would be to move even more code into Portage |
| 6 |
>> than you're already proposing. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Are the currently specified Display-If-* headers insufficient for some |
| 10 |
> reason? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Looking into this a little further, it seems that Display-If-Installed can be implemented with `portageq match / <atom>` and Display-If-Keyword can be implemented with `portageq envvar ARCH`. That leaves Display-If-Profile which may require a new portageq query in order to cleanly retrieve the profile. Perhaps something like profile=$(portageq profile) would be sufficient? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Zac |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives