Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for upower
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 11:41:31
Message-Id: CAGfcS_=gRarLoFg9iChi6AyOom6i4LnCQ9xeXbCaKV-XLujRTw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for upower by Alan McKinnon
1 On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote:
2 >
3 > Yes, it *is* a simple matter of running one easy command. Portage does
4 > that for you with trivial ease. But portage doesn't tell you *which* is
5 > the one easy command.
6 >
7 > A news item does that.
8
9 That is the real challenge here. It isn't obvious to most users that
10 upower is causing the problem, and it is even less obvious to users
11 without using Google that there is an alternative.
12
13 Anybody who doesn't read the lists or GMN wouldn't probably wouldn't
14 realize that the simple fix exists.
15
16 Maybe if portage were smart enough to present the user with two
17 options - replace udev with systemd or replace upower with
18 upower-pm-utils then users would realize the latter change is the
19 better one.
20
21 I don't want to put out a news item for everything, but when the
22 output of portage is subtle and the package is so widely used it is
23 probably better to have one.
24
25 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: news item for upower Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>