Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: news item for upower
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 16:22:29
Message-Id: pan$6076$dfd4ff62$d6e8cc50$47b40c47@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for upower by Rich Freeman
1 Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 04 Jun 2014 07:41:23 -0400 as excerpted:
2
3 > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
4 > wrote:
5 >>
6 >> Yes, it *is* a simple matter of running one easy command. Portage does
7 >> that for you with trivial ease. But portage doesn't tell you *which* is
8 >> the one easy command.
9 >>
10 >> A news item does that.
11 >
12 > That is the real challenge here. It isn't obvious to most users that
13 > upower is causing the problem, and it is even less obvious to users
14 > without using Google that there is an alternative.
15 >
16 > Anybody who doesn't read the lists or GMN wouldn't probably wouldn't
17 > realize that the simple fix exists.
18
19 This.
20
21 It's only simple for me because I saw it right here ahead of time, and
22 it's only simple for ssuominen because he knows about the other choice
23 since he created the package. Otherwise, it's an exercise in reading the
24 ebuilds, and a good gentooer should be /able/ to do that, but shouldn't
25 /have/ to do that in the normal case.
26
27 --
28 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
29 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
30 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: news item for upower Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o>