| 1 |
Sebastian Dröge wrote: |
| 2 |
> But a generic userspace filesystem is the cleaner solution for |
| 3 |
> something which needs a userspace application to work... why should |
| 4 |
> one develop the same parts over and over again when there's a generic |
| 5 |
> solution for such things? smbfs/cifs could also be implemented this |
| 6 |
> way much cleaner |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Are you just arguing a point, or does lufs actually work for you? I once tried |
| 9 |
a few of the lufs "modules" and all were extremely unreliable. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Daniel |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives