Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: git security (SHA-1) | ||
| Date: | Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:14:09 | ||
| Message-Id: | 21534.45812.909302.436951@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: git security (SHA-1) by "Michał Górny" |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Do you really consider keeping a key open for machine signing |
| 4 | > somewhat secure? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | You mean, as compared to manifests (or commits) signed by 250 |
| 7 | different developers' keys? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: git security (SHA-1) | Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: git security (SHA-1) | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |