1 |
[replying here as it already cleared out a couple of things i wanted |
2 |
to ask] |
3 |
|
4 |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 05:19:03PM +0000, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: |
5 |
> 3. The proctors would be given the access required to execute any |
6 |
> suspensions or similar actions. |
7 |
|
8 |
Please define access. Does that mean they get to ban people from the |
9 |
forums and all #gentoo-* channels? Do they get mod/op powers or just |
10 |
request it from the respective forum moderators / channel operators |
11 |
(who _have_ to follow their orders)? |
12 |
|
13 |
This is also very unclear in the doc: |
14 |
> Things that could get you banned/suspended from Gentoo's official |
15 |
> communication infrastructure: |
16 |
|
17 |
What exactly is Gentoo's official communication infrastructure? The |
18 |
mailinglists? _All_ IRC channels? So far #gentoo and #gentoo-dev are |
19 |
the only channels following some official policy, all others are ruled |
20 |
by whatever project/owner they have (afaik, correct me if |
21 |
wrong). Would a ban also affect all #gentoo-* channels and the forums? |
22 |
Posting on planet? What about gentoo developers calling people names |
23 |
in non-gentoo channels while wearing a gentoo cloak on irc or being |
24 |
otherwise easily identified as such (e.g. posting flames to debian |
25 |
mailing lists using @gentoo.org email)? |
26 |
|
27 |
> 4. By Gentoo fora/Official Communication Channels we refer to all |
28 |
> official channels of communication; MLs, IRC, Forums, IM, Bugzilla etc. |
29 |
|
30 |
Kind of answers my question, but i'm still asking for confirmation |
31 |
because i have a hard time believing it. Do the proctors get to |
32 |
overrule every team that moderates some communication channel already? |
33 |
|
34 |
> (This does NOT mean we are replacing guidelines for sub-fora -- the CoC |
35 |
> would be in addition to IRC and Forum guidelines). |
36 |
|
37 |
This should be added to the doc - as far i understand it defines |
38 |
minimum standards, and there are additional rules for certain irc |
39 |
channels and the forums (probably best to link them in the guide). |
40 |
|
41 |
Furthermore this raises an important question for me: |
42 |
So far, the forums moderators (as well as the ops in #gentoo) have |
43 |
enforced their policies. As long proctors and mods/ops are of the same |
44 |
opinion about a person, fine - but what about the following |
45 |
situations: |
46 |
|
47 |
- A developer misbehaves on the forums according to the forums staff |
48 |
and gets banned by them. |
49 |
|
50 |
So far, it has been our policy (not written, and hardly used every 2 |
51 |
years) to let devrel know about it in case they wanted to do something |
52 |
else about it. I guess it would make sense to continue that. |
53 |
What if the proctors disagree with the ban? |
54 |
|
55 |
- The proctors think someone is misbehaving on the forums and want him |
56 |
banned, while the forums staff think it is not ban worthy. What now? |
57 |
|
58 |
> I also understand that the timeframe for |
59 |
> peer-review is shorter than what you have all expected (and wished for), |
60 |
> and I fully understand the annoyance in regards to this. It's shorter |
61 |
> than what we had originally aimed for. |
62 |
|
63 |
I seriously hope the council doesn't do a final vote on something |
64 |
where a lot of details are yet unclear and undefined, otherwise i'll |
65 |
vote the bums out. [1] |
66 |
Don't get me wrong, it's about time to do something, but rushing |
67 |
through something completely new probably will only make things worse. |
68 |
|
69 |
cheers, |
70 |
Wernfried |
71 |
|
72 |
[1] before anyone goes proctor on me, read |
73 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0039.html :-P |
74 |
|
75 |
-- |
76 |
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org |
77 |
Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org |
78 |
IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org |