From: | Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings | ||
Date: | Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:15:50 | ||
Message-Id: | 20160121181528.30e3ec4d@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings by William Hubbs |
1 | On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:53:58 -0600 |
2 | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > I would like to see a possible timelimit set on how long packages can |
5 | > stay in maintainer-needed; once a package goes there, if we can't find |
6 | > someone to maintain it, we should consider booting it after that time |
7 | > limit passes. |
8 | |
9 | Note that maintainer-needed doesn't necessarily mean package is crap. |
10 | Some simply don't really need a maintainer because they just work. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings | Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o> |