| 1 |
* Michael Orlitzky: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I guess we could keep "milter" for only regex-milter, but that has the |
| 4 |
> disadvantage that it messes with the opendmarc package in the meantime. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Of the three packages you mentioned, milter-regex (not regex-milter) is |
| 7 |
the only one with a name that actually contains "milter". OpenDMARC |
| 8 |
should never have user a user named milter in the first place, and in |
| 9 |
the future it should use "opendmarc". |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Besides, since nobody has claimed group/user "milter" before me, I think |
| 12 |
this falls under first come, first serve. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-Ralph |
Archives