| 1 |
Tiziano Müller wrote: |
| 2 |
> Having the EAPI versioned like this: X.Y where X is the postfix part of the |
| 3 |
> ebuild (foo-1.0.ebuild-X) and Y the "EAPI=Y" in the ebuild itself we could |
| 4 |
> increment Y in case the changes to the EAPI don't break sourcing (again: a |
| 5 |
> package manager will have to mask those ebuilds) while changes breaking the |
| 6 |
> sourcing of the ebuild need an increment of X to avoid that pm's not being |
| 7 |
> able to even source such an ebuild still can mask it properly (or just |
| 8 |
> ignore it). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
What benefits would that offer? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Cheers, |
| 13 |
-jkt |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
Archives