| 1 |
Rich Freeman: |
| 2 |
> It would make a lot more sense if we had a release-oriented strategy, |
| 3 |
> even if releases were hourly/daily/etc. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
If we are going that way, then we should think over the whole branching |
| 7 |
model. I have a few things in mind, but I think we are already |
| 8 |
fine-tuning stuff here that can still be fine-tuned later. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The workflow will have to be adjusted after git deployment anyway. We |
| 11 |
cannot foresee everything (e.g. maybe this will be a non-issue if |
| 12 |
projects accumulate changes and push them in intervals, as pointed out |
| 13 |
in my previous post). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If it doesn't work out with rerunning repoman, then we just tell people |
| 16 |
it's fine without it and think about alternative approaches, like |
| 17 |
creating additional branches, doing releases or whatnot. |
Archives