| 1 |
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 08:48 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> I guess when I hear stable, I think *UN*changing... not "changing less |
| 3 |
> often". Adding "some" stability is not what our users are asking for |
| 4 |
> from us. They are asking for a "stable" tree. A single tree cannot |
| 5 |
> provide this. Having a "bleeding" and a "stable" tree cannot provide |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
how do you provide security updates without changing the tree? That is the |
| 8 |
only thing that would change in this tree (until a new "release" is made, |
| 9 |
whether that be a new CD or a new tree, whatever). |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Cheers |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Corey Shields |
| 15 |
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team and Devrel Team |
| 16 |
Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees |
| 17 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives