Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 10:10:19
Message-Id: 36abd21874b734a6478dee2bb2874f4c4a98cbfb.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o by Max Magorsch
1 On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 18:57 +0000, Max Magorsch wrote:
2 > Hi all,
3 >
4 > Good news regarding packages.g.o!
5 >
6 > While the new packages.g.o version went into production some time
7 > ago,
8 > this also led to some false warnings about outdated package versions.
9 > This is because we currently take information about outdated package
10 > versions from repology.org, which are not always accurate.
11 >
12
13
14 Any plans on using the remoteid from metadata.xml ?
15 It's likely to be much more accurate since people have been filling
16 those manually for some time now ;)
17
18 Alexis

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving warnings on packages.g.o Max Magorsch <max@××××××××.de>