Archives
Archives
| From: | "Stephen P. Becker" <geoman@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Why autoconf in system? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:05:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 43257B71.7000700@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Why autoconf in system? by Frank Schafer |
||
| 1 | > Hi, as I mentioned, I built LFS without this (and I have coreutils on |
| 2 | > it ;) |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > Not at all - if we need to modify or create configure files during build |
| 5 | > as Paul and Martin said ... we need autoconf/automake |
| 6 | |
| 7 | And furthermore, many programs (or upstream authors if you prefer) are |
| 8 | braindead and don't know what some non-x86 arches are without updating |
| 9 | the config.sub/config.guess, and re-running autoconf/automake. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -Steve |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Why autoconf in system? | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |