| 1 |
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:12:41AM +0200, dams@×××.fr wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
<snip> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> FHS is made so that f*cking proprietary application get well installed on every |
| 6 |
> distribution, so that they can sell more, and make the big linux actors (IBM |
| 7 |
> and co), more rich. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If you agree with this way to let linux go forward (I have no opinion on that), |
| 10 |
> then be FHS compliant. It's certain that being FHS compliant is a plus when |
| 11 |
> dealing with proprietary software companies. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Of course, to make proprietary apps happy, Gentoo would also need to be |
| 14 |
LSB-compliant. And _that_ requires supporting RPMs, which I don't think we |
| 15 |
want to do (see the GWN from April 1). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Cheers, |
| 18 |
Kevin |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives