Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:08:40 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20131213160830.2340.qmail@stuge.se | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? by Sergey Popov |
||
| 1 | Sergey Popov wrote: |
| 2 | > >>> Last time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died |
| 3 | > >> |
| 4 | > >> If vixie-cron upstream is dead as you say |
| 5 | > > |
| 6 | > > Define dead? |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Bugs are not fixed for a very long time, no answers on private |
| 9 | > e-mails or in maillists. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Define very long time? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | //Peter |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? | Ben Kohler <bkohler@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? | Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? | Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o> |