Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Patch filename conventions (WAS: Proposal: patches.gentoo.org) | ||
| Date: | Thu, 14 Oct 2004 22:14:38 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200410141814.30358.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Patch filename conventions (WAS: Proposal: patches.gentoo.org) by Dylan Carlson |
||
| 1 | On Thursday 14 October 2004 06:08 pm, Dylan Carlson wrote: |
| 2 | > I know it's bad form to reply to your own message, but I'm doing it anyway. |
| 3 | > Here's my quick stab on filename convention: |
| 4 | |
| 5 | if a covention is going to be developed it's going to involve what epatch |
| 6 | already uses: |
| 7 | ##_${ARCH}_foo.patch |
| 8 | |
| 9 | if you want to flesh out the 'foo' part, fine, but the prefix involving a # |
| 10 | and $ARCH is already set in stone |
| 11 | -mike |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Patch filename conventions (WAS: Proposal: patches.gentoo.org) | Dylan Carlson <absinthe@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Patch filename conventions (WAS: Proposal: patches.gentoo.org) | "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> |