1 |
07.11.14 21:44, hasufell написав(ла): |
2 |
> On 11/07/2014 08:56 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Every time people compare portage to paludis I read stuff like "but |
5 |
> paludis is slower". That is incomplete information to put it diplomatic. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Do you really care so much about speed that you don't mind wrong results? |
8 |
> |
9 |
|
10 |
My original question was about Portage being too slow. And Paludis came out just as an alternative. |
11 |
|
12 |
And I would like to see a detailed discussion about what's wrong from the point of view of correctness with: |
13 |
|
14 |
1. PMS |
15 |
|
16 |
2. ebuilds in tree |
17 |
|
18 |
3. Portage dependency solving |
19 |
|
20 |
Was this discussed somewhere? Could you point me there? |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Jauhien |