| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto stable |
| 7 |
> makes sense, because less than 7 days later, a new version with |
| 8 |
> bug/security fixes is released. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Isn't our current rate of stabilization "selling" a promise of |
| 11 |
> stability we can't stand behind? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Mike |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Well to be perfectly honest, the current-stable 3.16 and 3.17 kernels |
| 17 |
for me at least have some rather unfortunate regressions over 3.15 and |
| 18 |
previous, so even with the stabilization we're achieving now I don't |
| 19 |
think we're living up to our "promise of stability" :) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlSm+2oACgkQ2ugaI38ACPD88QD+IX23em/uE3v7lpuuKnWvGDRR |
| 25 |
hMeVG1U+1NtdKp87Kr0A/jE2byckqz2eNgp8DwUE4fgOwI8lZACpafB1vcdPyWcQ |
| 26 |
=yAXA |
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives