Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Bjarke Sørensen" <bs@××××.dk>
To: Sherman Boyd <meekrob@×××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How should Gentoo docs be licensed?
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 15:15:44
Message-Id: 20020502201540.GA32632@wasd.dk
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] How should Gentoo docs be licensed? by Sherman Boyd
1 On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:04:26AM -0700, Sherman Boyd wrote:
2 > How should Gentoo docs be licensed? I know of two documentation licenses, the GFDL and the OPL. Anyone know of any alternatives?
3 > http://www.fsf.org/licenses/fdl.html
4 > http://opencontent.org/openpub/
5
6 > Both licenses are seem good to me, but I am not a copyright lawyer. The GFDL is definitely longer, and more specific. The OPL is short and clean, easily understood by a layperson.
7
8 Is this settled yet?
9 Or should I bring my 5 cents?
10
11 --
12 | 9000.WASD
13 |
14 | Bjarke Sørensen
15 | http://wasd.dk/
16 |
17 | There are 10 types of people in this world:
18 | Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] How should Gentoo docs be licensed? Jean-Michel Smith <jsmith@××××.com>