Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Do (old-ish) Portage QA checks comprise policy?
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 23:18:07
Message-Id: f0474f03-af42-5093-d4ca-abf868075a92@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Do (old-ish) Portage QA checks comprise policy? by William Hubbs
1 On 11/4/19 2:40 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
2 >
3 > This is a whole other thread I've been talking about for years, but if
4 > we want to be concerned about dumping "garbage" on people's limited root
5 > file systems, there are other things we need to re-consider, like our
6 > notion that we have to install small files everywhere even though they
7 > aren't always used.
8 >
9 > So, if you want to talk about that, please start a whole new thread.
10 >
11
12 1. The idea that we should fix all existing problems before we can
13 prevent people from creating new ones is ridiculous.
14
15 2. Those other files don't get installed to the root filesystem on the
16 systems that we're talking about.
17
18 3. Those other files generally aren't completely useless.
19
20 4. "small files" aren't big.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Do (old-ish) Portage QA checks comprise policy? Michael 'veremitz' Everitt <gentoo@×××××××.xyz>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Do (old-ish) Portage QA checks comprise policy? William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>