| 1 |
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:56:36AM +0000, Steve Long wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I agree, though year of birth might be interesting. Income and children |
| 4 |
> > are a bit too private. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> ++ in general although I do think parenthood (if responsible) is as relevant |
| 7 |
> as age. A 28 year old with a 5 year old kid has a lot to show a 35 year old |
| 8 |
> doctoral student with no kids, even if it's not all technical. # of kids |
| 9 |
> isn't relevant. |
| 10 |
I put # of kids in there as a lark, perhaps it might be better as 'do |
| 11 |
you have children', with an eye to seeing how it affects their package |
| 12 |
choices - see games and education packages for kids, plus the previous |
| 13 |
USE=offensive debate on the desktop backgrounds with scantily-clad |
| 14 |
woman. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> Maybe it's not something you want to ask the users, but it would be more |
| 17 |
> interesting wrt devs, as would statistics on standard Equal Ops monitoring |
| 18 |
> (a legal requirement on employers in the UK, even if the person declines to |
| 19 |
> answer, which is ofc their right.) |
| 20 |
Go some good links on that? They might have good question wording we can |
| 21 |
borrow? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 25 |
Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy |
| 26 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 27 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |
Archives