1 |
On Sun, 24 May 2009 21:31:56 +0100 |
2 |
Steven J Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
3 |
> > ...but that's not what happens. Instead, the users get their screen |
4 |
> > spammed with annoying messages, |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Er I think you're confusing paludis and portage. |
7 |
|
8 |
Er. No. As you would know had you read GLEP 55, Portage is noisy if you |
9 |
use bash 4 features in an ebuild and it doesn't have metadata. |
10 |
|
11 |
> > get confused and run to bugzilla in droves. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> Nice to see you have such a high opinion of our users. |
14 |
|
15 |
You mean, nice to see that I was around and watching what happened back |
16 |
when we didn't have EAPIs to protect us from this sort of thing? |
17 |
|
18 |
> Here, this sums up what's wrong with most of your cockamamy ideas (as |
19 |
> attractive, and oh so right, as they may seem to you now): |
20 |
> |
21 |
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/taoup/html/ch01s07.html |
22 |
> |
23 |
> To paraphrase you: Go and read it and don't come back til you've |
24 |
> actually understood the concepts. |
25 |
|
26 |
Sorry, you don't get to post that kind of response until you start |
27 |
being right. In light of you being wrong (see above), please apologise |
28 |
and retract your remarks. |
29 |
|
30 |
> > This just takes us right back to the bad old days when changing |
31 |
> > anything would result in mass user confusion. The whole 'EAPI' thing |
32 |
> > wasn't an arbitrary whim. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Nor was it supposed to be a six-monthly dump to the list along with a |
35 |
> whole slew of new, half-baked 'proposals' "everyone has to comply" |
36 |
> with as "it's in PMS." |
37 |
> |
38 |
> Abuse of process doesn't make you right; it just makes you annoying. |
39 |
|
40 |
If you have a problem with the EAPI process, I suggest you take it up |
41 |
with the Council. But given they've recently voted that everyone has to |
42 |
comply with PMS or get p.masked, and that we'll do new EAPIs whenever |
43 |
there are features available, and that they considered the EAPI 3 |
44 |
feature list to be appropriate, I doubt you'll get very far. |
45 |
|
46 |
-- |
47 |
Ciaran McCreesh |