| 1 |
On Sunday 24 May 2009 22:43:52 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > Here, this sums up what's wrong with most of your cockamamy ideas (as |
| 4 |
> > attractive, and oh so right, as they may seem to you now): |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/taoup/html/ch01s07.html |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > To paraphrase you: Go and read it and don't come back til you've |
| 9 |
> > actually understood the concepts. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Sorry, you don't get to post that kind of response until you start |
| 12 |
> being right. In light of you being wrong (see above), please apologise |
| 13 |
> and retract your remarks. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Ciaran, |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
this mailinglist is not your personal playground. As you obviously can't even |
| 18 |
be bothered to reflect on other peoples statements without reflex-posting |
| 19 |
something unrelated I must ask you to stop spamming us. It's just not funny |
| 20 |
anymore. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Okay, yes, Mr. Long was quite rude there (trying to fight fire with fire I |
| 23 |
guess). But in this case you're discussing rather subjective things again (how |
| 24 |
often is it the case that you don't have a cache?) that might not even be a |
| 25 |
problem. And, as you consistently don't read any arguments that might |
| 26 |
interfere with how you want reality to be, sometimes people use harsher |
| 27 |
language in the hope of making you read (and maybe even understand) their |
| 28 |
argument. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Now please stop playing the drama queen, stop spamming (yes, replying to every |
| 31 |
mail is spamming) and maybe we can return to a technical discussion, as this |
| 32 |
mailinglist was originally intended (or so I hope). |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Thanks in advance, |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
your friendly neighborhood kitten. |
Archives