Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Roles v2
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 20:55:02
Message-Id: 20060302205142.240b5105@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Roles v2 by Paul de Vrieze
1 On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:38:33 +0100 Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
2 wrote:
3 | Then explain people that doing this is not the way.
4
5 Have done, repeatedly, as have many others.
6
7 | And is it really a qualityissue? In all cases? There must be cases
8 | where the problem is package + arch + useflag specific, and this
9 | solution "solves" it.
10
11 This is most definitely a quality issue in cases where it is misused.
12 See my reply to Grobian for why it's a huge problem. And yes, there are
13 legit cases of using !arch? inside DEPEND, which is what makes it even
14 harder to detect deliberate repoman circumvention.
15
16 --
17 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat)
18 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
19 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Roles v2 Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>