| 1 |
On Sat, 2007-07-14 at 17:45 +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote: |
| 2 |
> The recent development of council meetings and their |
| 3 |
> summaries not being posted (or at least very late) to the list makes me |
| 4 |
> think that there is some alienation between council and developers, |
| 5 |
> which i hope i can change. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
While any efforts you put forth if elected to the council will |
| 8 |
appreciated. Let's not take a malicious stance against our current |
| 9 |
council. I don't thing they are intentionally alienating, or delaying in |
| 10 |
summaries. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Anyone notice no more GWNs? IMHO they like many of us are simply over |
| 13 |
committed. So things don't always get done in reasonable or ideal time |
| 14 |
frames. I doubt there is any intentional delay in presenting the |
| 15 |
summaries and etc. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Then again, their meetings aren't held in private, and one should not |
| 18 |
solely rely on summaries. Unless there is a policy stating such |
| 19 |
summaries are required or etc. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
| 23 |
Gentoo/Java |
Archives