1 |
Olivier CrĂȘte wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 2007-10-05 at 14:20 -0400, Patrick McLean wrote: |
3 |
> > Jim Ramsay wrote: |
4 |
> > > |
5 |
> > > 1) Create a single local USE flag (flashsupport or something) |
6 |
> > > that will just pull in this dependency. |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > 2) Use the same set of USE flags as libflashsupport has, with any |
9 |
> > > of them adding libflashsupport to the dep list, since these are |
10 |
> > > all global flags and will most likely be enabled for both |
11 |
> > > netscape-flash and libflashsupport |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > > I'm personally thinking (1) is the better of the 2 options, but |
14 |
> > > I'd like to know if anyone has any other wondrous solutions to |
15 |
> > > this. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Does/will anything else dep on flashsupport? If not, why not just |
18 |
> > add the USE flags to netscape-flash and install libflashsupport as |
19 |
> > part of the netscape-flash install instead of a separate package. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> If its a separate package that will be updated separately, then it |
22 |
> doesn't make sense to put it in the separate package and I support |
23 |
> option 1. Otherwise, if they'll always be together, then just put it |
24 |
> in the same package. |
25 |
|
26 |
Yes, libflashsupport is distributed separately and is on a different |
27 |
release schedule than netscape-flash. |
28 |
|
29 |
I suppose I could also propose: |
30 |
|
31 |
4) netscape-flash just RDEPENDS on libflashsupport all the time. It's |
32 |
certainly not a large library to be added on. |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Jim Ramsay |
36 |
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm) |